Those are, always, the same inquires; economy, jobs, taxation, what  they say or say not... but no matter what, that never help the people to get the right person for the job, maybe the one with more personality or charisma. That is not even close to a leader.

 As far as I can remember since Nixon-Reagan (1968) to date, none of the questions made by panels, or otherwise, brought any light to the American voter. We are declining in smartness and political knowledge. Sense of history was lost around the Civil War, the founding of the United States was made a joke of it with the excuse of (everybody knows that) freedom for slaves. 

 Was like politics, treaties and compromising were not the base for democracy and human relations. After that: excuses, excuses, excuses for dummies. Empty words from politicians defending somebody else, not their own people, money.    

 We are losing more freedom, every election get us closer to a new failure, we are not good in bringing peace to the world (or conquering it). Every 4 years I see some of the dinosaur from the pass trying to make it. We are surrounded by failures and frustrated wannabes that put their hopes, not in experience but in magical wands, that they know, are an excusable long shot: the military, the budget, the minority, the majority, the party, etc, etc. 

 Where are human, logical and interesting question like:

 Do you intend to influence the Congress to pay for punching bags, so the police do not use your voters as such or if they do not, to need so many of them (agents) to break a nose once in a while?

Or.- Do you plan to stop sending so many guns to the Middle East, or stop been the bodyguard of Israel, or at least give a break to the Palestinian?

Or.- Will you use the President's influence in the Congress to limit the use of robots and automatic equipment in places where such uses will affect so many labor workers that no to do so is corroding the economy, and not any "journalist" talk about that?

 If anybody in those panels ask directly to Donald Trump, he will give a sincere answer. Because he is, basically, an honest man, not afraid of what the virtual majority, created by social/TV media, will say. He will interpret and try to convey what the majority (the 90%) is thinking, and if he does not agree with it, he will confess his disapproval and will say why not, without any prattling, when the moment arrive. What he will do, will, not by force, money or intimidation, but because principles, conscience or gallantry. Just because he is a real man, that endangered specie from the American political scene.

 So Megan; stop picking on the guy, he is too much for you. 

 Cleared that, and since you Miss Kelly, are closer to the pachydermatous convolute law treatises than to the common working man, people's journalist that are supposed to (clear?) interview or whatever your FOX, CNN, ABC, and henceforth expect to accomplish in those bad imitations of an Italian congress session. 

 I think you should keep your Republican missiles for the Democrats since there is a woman in their sector that is stronger, wiser and maybe experienced that any republican woman and more men. And... if women in this country do not want to be less that any man, they better stop been hiding behind their aprons and show their forces instead of criticizing their female counterparts in other nations, which probable they do not know anything about it, but what they hear in the biased, sold out, hypocritical and sissy media. 

 Also allow me to remind you that Santa Claus is a product of somebody hyper imagination, and that Jesus is not Jew or Caucasian, like some clones pretend to teach, but very probably; Palestinian or stretching the situation, maybe Armenian.  

Len Zayas 8/15